Alright, sorry for the brief hiatus. This weeks topic is Fun Dip vs Pixie Sticks. Pixie Sticks are way better than Fun Dip. There are several reasons why, but I am going to focus on a couple. The first one and most important one is the stick that you use with Fun Dip tastes horrible. Its basically like picking up a piece of chalk and eating it. There is not one quality of that stick that I like or anyone would like.
Secondly, Fun Dip requires two hands to use and takes isn't easy to eat. A Pixie Stick is 1 straw, suck it down and then you're done took all of 10 seconds. With the size of the Pixie Stick you're able to control the amount of sugar intake you get, cause they are smaller. With Fun Dip you open the entire package and when you run out of the chalk stick and still have sugar leftover, you basically have a pixie stick. Also in an economy that we're in now-a-days a Pixie Stick is more economical. You can get 3 different flavors for way cheaper than 1 Fun Dip. I see no downside to a Pixie Sticks, its cheaper, better, and faster. Fun Dip, straight up is horrible.
Sunday, March 7, 2010
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Pop Tart vs Toaster Strudel
Alright so one I think this one is way lop sided, but that is me. To start things off Pop Tarts are way better than Toaster Strudel's.
One Pop Tarts are easier to make, can keep them in the cabinet and either throw them in the toaster which takes 2 minutes or you can just eat them without heating them up. Toaster Strudel's offer you only one of those options, there is no other option than heating up on Strudel's. So your time value on Pop Tarts is way higher. Cause everyone is always in a hurry in the mornings and wants something that they can grab quick and take on the go.
Now, lets not forget the packet of frosting that you have to apply to the Strudel. Now we can agree that it adds a level of excellence to the product but don't forget Pop Tarts have frosting too and you don't have to spend all the effort to apply it. We can't neglect either the fact that how many times have you made a Toaster Strudel and been like man I want TWO packets of frosting ( come on I know we all have). Then next thing you know you, you're at your last one and you don't have any frosting left and how bummed are you, I mean completely. Your day has been ruined! You have no hope left for the rest of your day, because your breakfast has been totally F'd.
Variety is way greater too, more flavors are in Pop Tarts than their rival. Pop Tarts offer more versatility too, you can eat them at anytime during the day because you can eat them cold, Toaster Strudel's as in there name need to be heated up to achieve any level of satisfaction. Otherwise they are completely worthless
Lastly, which would you rather have, a Biscuit or a Croissant? If you say croissant you can swim your happy !@# back to France. Not to mention, we all know the guy on the front of the Toaster Strudel box is super creepy.
One Pop Tarts are easier to make, can keep them in the cabinet and either throw them in the toaster which takes 2 minutes or you can just eat them without heating them up. Toaster Strudel's offer you only one of those options, there is no other option than heating up on Strudel's. So your time value on Pop Tarts is way higher. Cause everyone is always in a hurry in the mornings and wants something that they can grab quick and take on the go.
Now, lets not forget the packet of frosting that you have to apply to the Strudel. Now we can agree that it adds a level of excellence to the product but don't forget Pop Tarts have frosting too and you don't have to spend all the effort to apply it. We can't neglect either the fact that how many times have you made a Toaster Strudel and been like man I want TWO packets of frosting ( come on I know we all have). Then next thing you know you, you're at your last one and you don't have any frosting left and how bummed are you, I mean completely. Your day has been ruined! You have no hope left for the rest of your day, because your breakfast has been totally F'd.
Variety is way greater too, more flavors are in Pop Tarts than their rival. Pop Tarts offer more versatility too, you can eat them at anytime during the day because you can eat them cold, Toaster Strudel's as in there name need to be heated up to achieve any level of satisfaction. Otherwise they are completely worthless
Lastly, which would you rather have, a Biscuit or a Croissant? If you say croissant you can swim your happy !@# back to France. Not to mention, we all know the guy on the front of the Toaster Strudel box is super creepy.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Peanut Butter M and M's is better than Reese's Pieces
To start my blog I am going to start with the subject that spawned the idea of the blog itself. Peanut Butter M&M's is way better than Reese's Pieces. If you don't agree let me tell you why you should.
Let me start out with this all, Reese's has is a hard candy shell and the peanut better, no one in there right mind buys the Reese's for the hard candy shell. M&M's offers you chocolate, peanut butter, and a hard candy shell. Having 2 options chocolate & peanut butter allows you to quench your chocolate appetite. Next, you get more Peanut Butter with one M&M than you do with one Reese's and lets be honest you bought one of these products for the peanut butter nothing else. Some people might argue that you can get more Reese's with a hand full that you can with M&M's well I cannot doubt that but being that the M&M's are a tad bigger they are easier to handle giving you the ability to manage your intake of M&M's better. Being easier to handle is one thing, but even if you have a handful of Reese's Pieces that means the more you eat in a handful the more candy shell you get, and if you think about it the hard candy shell holds everything together which is like pretty much eating skin.
Also Peanut Butter M&M's have been around since 1954, Reese's Pieces 1978. Time is on M&M's side. With that said I think I am heading to the gas station all this talk about Peanut Butter M&M's makes me want to sit down and taste excellence in a bag.
Let me start out with this all, Reese's has is a hard candy shell and the peanut better, no one in there right mind buys the Reese's for the hard candy shell. M&M's offers you chocolate, peanut butter, and a hard candy shell. Having 2 options chocolate & peanut butter allows you to quench your chocolate appetite. Next, you get more Peanut Butter with one M&M than you do with one Reese's and lets be honest you bought one of these products for the peanut butter nothing else. Some people might argue that you can get more Reese's with a hand full that you can with M&M's well I cannot doubt that but being that the M&M's are a tad bigger they are easier to handle giving you the ability to manage your intake of M&M's better. Being easier to handle is one thing, but even if you have a handful of Reese's Pieces that means the more you eat in a handful the more candy shell you get, and if you think about it the hard candy shell holds everything together which is like pretty much eating skin.
Also Peanut Butter M&M's have been around since 1954, Reese's Pieces 1978. Time is on M&M's side. With that said I think I am heading to the gas station all this talk about Peanut Butter M&M's makes me want to sit down and taste excellence in a bag.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)